• LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Google+
.
|
TechRecs: Cool Tools & Hot Topics
|
Microsoft sues AT&T customer for activating pirated copies of Windows 7 & Office 2010 – Reposted from Network World
Posted on December 15, 2014 by

networkworldWhen looking for ways to reduce your technology spending for your business, you should never roll the dice to see if you can get away with purchasing pirated or gray market software.  Some may wonder if Microsoft would really know if they exceeded the number of users in their multi-user agreements or activated pirated copies of software. The answer is a resounding yes.  According to an article published by Network World, “Microsoft settled 3,265 software piracy cases across 19 U.S. states and 42 countries in 2013”. The post offers some insight into how the company’s cyberforensic team identifies suspicious activation patterns and how far they are willing to go to pursue the perpetrators. We thought we would share the article with our readers.

Microsoft is gunning for an AT&T customer who activated too many pirated copies of Windows 7 and Office 2010. The Redmond giant has the IP and wants the person(s) unmasked and to pay up.

Other than knowing Microsoft is very opposed to having its products pirated, it’s somewhat rare to learn how Microsoft uses suspicious product activation patterns to determine pirated products. Yet a complaint Microsoft filed a in a U.S. District Court in Seattle, Washington, gives us some insight into how the company’s cyberforensic team identifies suspicious activation patterns.

In 2014, there were several examples of what we normally hear in regard to Microsoft fighting piracy. Microsoft released a white paper titled “The Link Between Pirated Software and Cybersecurity Breaches: How Malware in Pirated Software is Costing the World Billions”. Microsoft also joined efforts with attorney generals in Louisiana and Oklahoma in order to tackle overseas software piracy such as has been rampant in China. At the start of December, Microsoft Germany cracked down on deceptive sales of products keys for Windows and Office by blocking 50,000 license keys. The keys to activate products had been included in “temporary licenses for trial versions or OEM licenses that had been sold illegally.”

Although Microsoft claims not to know the “true identities” of the defendants pirating its software, it knows the IP address, 76.245.7.147, and that the alleged pirates are using AT&T as an ISP.

The new complaint filed (pdf) in federal court explains, “A Microsoft product key is a 25-character alphanumeric string generated by Microsoft and provided to customers and OEMs.” The product key and “other technical information” about a device are generally transmitted to activation servers located in Tukwila, Washington.

Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) distribution channels include the sub-channels of the Commercial OEM channel (COEM) and the Direct OEM channel (DOEM). Microsoft wrote that COEMs use “individual product keys to install and activate software” on PCs. DOEMs use “either a master key to install Windows software (as in the case with Windows 7) or a separate file generated from Microsoft to install and activate Windows software (as in the case with Windows 8) for each device.”

Microsoft said it launched the Microsoft Cyber Center to combat the piracy of its software. Microsoft cybercrime “cyberforensic” methods include analyzing “product key activation data voluntarily provided by users when they active Microsoft software, including the IP address from which a given product key is activated.” Voluntarily seems like an odd wording, considering you must enter a product key to activate Microsoft’s software as ‘genuine.’

Nevertheless, Microsoft wrote: Cyberforensics allows Microsoft to analyze billions of activations of Microsoft software and identify activation patterns and characteristics that make it more likely than not that the IP address associated with the activations is an address through which pirated software is being activated.

It’s not spelled out how many times pirated copies of Windows 7 and Office 2010 were activated in order to gain Microsoft’s displeasure and legal attention, but the complaint added:

On information and belief, Defendants have activated numerous copies of Windows 7 and Office 2010 with product keys that have the following characteristics:

a) Product keys known to have been stolen from Microsoft’s supply chain;

b) DOEM product keys impermissibly used in the COEM and/or refurbisher channel; and

c) Product keys of various types used more times than is authorized by the applicable software license.

Microsoft settled 3,265 software piracy cases across 19 U.S. states and 42 countries in 2013; it primarily went after big dog companies that were redirecting “money saved by using pirated software to hire employees and to expand their facilities and their research and development efforts.” The new complaint  also does not appear to be going after individuals using pirated copies of Windows and Office, but after a person or persons continually activating Windows 7 and Office 2010.

It seems likely Microsoft is gunning for someone selling computers loaded with pirated Microsoft products. Microsoft wrote, “Defendants’ activities are likely to lead the public to conclude, incorrectly, that the infringing materials that Defendants are advertising, marketing, installing, offering, and/or distributing originate with or are authorized by Microsoft, thereby harming Microsoft, its licensees, and the public.”

Microsoft wants the defendants unmasked and for them to pay for the pirated software as well as hand over any “illegally received money and profits in the form of bank accounts, real property, or personal property that can be located and traced.”

As Torrent Freak pointed out, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella previously claimed Microsoft has always had “freemium” software, otherwise known as piracy; but sometimes using the product can turns pirates into paying customers.

Lastly in Microsoft news, Kevin Turner, Chief Operating Officer at Microsoft, said the company wants “Windows 10 on billions of devices,” but despite previous speculation, don’t count on Microsoft releasing Windows for free.

For more information on solutions for running your businesses’ technology more efficiently, visit our website or contact Megan Meisner at mmeisner@launchpadonline.com or 813 448-7100 x210.
Posted in TechRecs: Cool Tools & Hot Topics, Small Business IT Management, Small Business Web Strategies, IT Solutions - Cloud | Mobile, IT Solutions - Stay Secure
The Dogs Have Their Day. The Launch Pad Team Strides for Strays
Zap Your Apps to Save Time & Boost Productivity with Zapier

Related Posts

  • How to Show All Icons in System Tray on Windows 11

    Do you find it inconvenient having to click an up-arrow icon to see all your
    read more
  • Don’t Get Caught by the Human Resources Self-Review Phishing Scam

    When people receive an email that looks like it’s from a trusted source, like their
    read more
  • Update Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge Right Now

    Earlier this week, a security vulnerability in the WebP codec was disclosed, affecting many applications
    read more
  • How to Save a Route on Google Maps

    What to Know When Saving Routes in Google Maps In this guide, we will use
    read more
Logging In...

Profile cancel

Sign in with Twitter Sign in with Facebook
or

Not published

TO WEBSITE >>
launchpadonline.com

CATEGORIES

  • Launch Pad News
  • TechRecs: Cool Tools & Hot Topics
  • Small Business IT Management
  • Small Business Web Strategies
  • IT Solutions – Cloud | Mobile
  • IT Solutions – Stay Secure
  • ITs Easy Being Green
  • RevITup TechCare Client Forum
  • GreenBack Nonprofit Wish List
  • Launch Pad Franchise Forum
  • Launch Pad Partner News

Cloud Computing in Plain English

Copyright © 2023 | Privacy Policy
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Google+

Archives

  • September 2023 (3)
  • August 2023 (5)
  • July 2023 (3)
  • June 2023 (5)
  • May 2023 (4)
  • April 2023 (3)
  • March 2023 (4)
  • February 2023 (3)
  • January 2023 (3)
  • December 2022 (2)
  • November 2022 (2)
  • October 2022 (2)
  • September 2022 (3)
  • August 2022 (3)
  • July 2022 (2)
  • June 2022 (3)
  • May 2022 (2)
  • April 2022 (2)
  • March 2022 (2)
  • February 2022 (3)
  • January 2022 (2)
  • December 2021 (2)
  • November 2021 (3)
  • October 2021 (3)
  • September 2021 (3)
  • August 2021 (3)
  • July 2021 (2)
  • June 2021 (4)
  • May 2021 (3)
  • April 2021 (2)
  • March 2021 (2)
  • February 2021 (3)
  • January 2021 (2)
  • December 2020 (2)
  • November 2020 (2)
  • October 2020 (4)
  • September 2020 (2)
  • August 2020 (3)
  • July 2020 (2)
  • June 2020 (3)
  • May 2020 (2)
  • April 2020 (3)
  • March 2020 (3)
  • February 2020 (3)
  • January 2020 (4)
  • December 2019 (3)
  • November 2019 (2)
  • October 2019 (4)
  • September 2019 (3)
  • August 2019 (4)
  • July 2019 (2)
  • June 2019 (3)
  • May 2019 (3)
  • April 2019 (3)
  • March 2019 (3)
  • February 2019 (3)
  • January 2019 (4)
  • December 2018 (3)
  • November 2018 (4)
  • October 2018 (3)
  • September 2018 (2)
  • August 2018 (3)
  • July 2018 (3)
  • June 2018 (3)
  • May 2018 (2)
  • April 2018 (3)
  • March 2018 (3)
  • February 2018 (3)
  • January 2018 (3)
  • December 2017 (3)
  • November 2017 (4)
  • October 2017 (3)
  • September 2017 (4)
  • August 2017 (4)
  • July 2017 (4)
  • June 2017 (3)
  • May 2017 (5)
  • April 2017 (4)
  • March 2017 (4)
  • February 2017 (5)
  • January 2017 (4)
  • December 2016 (3)
  • November 2016 (4)
  • October 2016 (4)
  • September 2016 (4)
  • August 2016 (5)
  • July 2016 (4)
  • June 2016 (5)
  • May 2016 (3)
  • April 2016 (4)
  • March 2016 (4)
  • February 2016 (3)
  • January 2016 (3)
  • December 2015 (4)
  • November 2015 (4)
  • October 2015 (3)
  • September 2015 (3)
  • August 2015 (3)
  • July 2015 (3)
  • June 2015 (5)
  • May 2015 (4)
  • April 2015 (6)
  • March 2015 (4)
  • February 2015 (2)
  • January 2015 (5)
  • December 2014 (4)
  • November 2014 (3)
  • October 2014 (8)
  • September 2014 (5)
  • August 2014 (2)
  • July 2014 (3)
  • June 2014 (6)
  • May 2014 (3)
  • April 2014 (6)
  • March 2014 (5)
  • February 2014 (3)
  • January 2014 (5)
  • December 2013 (4)
  • November 2013 (4)
  • October 2013 (6)
  • September 2013 (3)
  • August 2013 (5)
  • July 2013 (6)
  • June 2013 (4)
  • May 2013 (3)
  • April 2013 (4)
  • March 2013 (4)
  • February 2013 (3)
  • January 2013 (5)
  • December 2012 (4)
  • November 2012 (5)
  • October 2012 (5)
  • September 2012 (6)
  • August 2012 (6)
  • July 2012 (6)
  • June 2012 (3)
  • May 2012 (7)
  • April 2012 (6)
  • March 2012 (10)
  • February 2012 (6)
  • January 2012 (5)
  • December 2011 (7)
  • November 2011 (9)
  • October 2011 (4)
  • September 2011 (4)
  • August 2011 (11)
  • July 2011 (14)
  • June 2011 (4)
  • May 2011 (11)
  • April 2011 (8)
  • March 2011 (11)
  • February 2011 (11)
  • January 2011 (21)
  • December 2010 (10)
  • November 2010 (10)
  • October 2010 (8)
  • September 2010 (10)
  • August 2010 (12)
  • July 2010 (8)
  • June 2010 (9)
  • May 2010 (8)
  • April 2010 (7)
  • March 2010 (10)
  • February 2010 (8)
  • January 2010 (6)
  • December 2009 (7)
  • November 2009 (13)
  • October 2009 (11)
  • September 2009 (16)
  • August 2009 (13)
  • July 2009 (16)
  • June 2009 (18)
  • May 2009 (16)